As far as I understand the article, thats should not matter in this case. They did not "touch" the coins to cause this problem. They just recorded their value i

As far as I understand the article, thats should not matter in this case. They did not "touch" the coins to cause this problem. They just recorded their value in SEK instead the raw number of BTC so when the process was over, they had to pay back the difference between what they sized originally (36 BTC, 1.3mio SEK a few years/months ago) and what they wrote down in their records (1.3 mio SEK or ~3 BTC nowadays). The same might happen for every other "foregin" currency, right?