3 ms·
Reading the legal arguments of the Gail ceramic company makes me never want to do business with that horrible company. >> "Respondent’s domain name was registe
by hermannj314 5y ago
Reading the legal arguments of the Gail ceramic company makes me never want to do business with that horrible company.
>> "Respondent’s domain name was registered and is being used in bad faith. The domain name <gail.com> is nearly identical to the trademarks owned by the Complainant and was registered to prevent the Complainant from reflecting the trademark GAIL in a corresponding domain name. Furthermore, because the Respondent registered the domain name exactly when the Complainant increased its sales of GAIL products to the United States, this should be identified as an abusive practice"
Ugh. Seriously? Who pays a lawyer to write horrible stuff like this. It is so pathetic and there was no evidence any of it is true. At least the respondent won the case.
- walrus01 5y agoIf you think that's bad you should see the extended legal battle a guy with the family name Nissan had to engage in when he was sued by the car company.
- duud 5y agoAnd the theft of France.com. This kind of behaviour is all too common. https://domainnamewire.com/2021/03/25/court-rules-france-can-keep-france-com/ https://domainnamewire.com/2021/03/25/court-rules-france-can...
- nix23 5y agoLego is pretty bad too.