I like explicit error handling, but I wish there were a concise way to handle errors from the same line. A one-line function call `foo()` becomes four times as

I like explicit error handling, but I wish there were a concise way to handle errors from the same line. A one-line function call `foo()` becomes four times as long once you handle errors. result, err := foo() if err != nil { return nil, fmt.Errorf("Error message: %w", err) } This pattern is just so commonplace, but it's four times as long. Contrast with Rust, which handles errors as `foo()?` or `foo().context("Error message")?`*. It's still explicit — I like it better than silently-propagating exceptions — but my functions don't wind up being 75% error handling. * Where the `context` function comes from an error-handling library.