4 ms·

Thanks for your feedback! Yes, unfortunately Copilot doesn't seem to think much of my programming security... > @authors: I think something is wrong in the phr

by kiwih 5y ago

Thanks for your feedback! Yes, unfortunately Copilot doesn't seem to think much of my programming security... > @authors: I think something is wrong in the phrasing for M-4 (or some text got jumbled). Was the top-scoring option vulnerable or not? The second half might belong to D-3 instead (where no assessment is given)? Argh, you're absolutely correct. Five authors proofreading the paper and still these things slip through. Fortunately we can fix it

comex 5y ago
More nits: - In Fig. 6 (Scenario 787-08), lines 2-4 appear to be truncated. [edit: I see you already responded to this elsewhere in the thread.] - The layout of the figure labels is confusing; at first glance it looks more like they're labeling what's under them, rather than above them. - The quotation marks are all turned into curly closing quotes. - This is more of a style thing, but the code snippets appear to be using a variable-width font laid out as if it were fixed width, which looks pretty bad. Perhaps the font isn't embedded properly.