vixen99 wrote: "With lockdowns, consequent suicides ... are ignored" There is no evidence that there are consequent suicides. Nor that they are ignored. You w

vixen99 wrote: "With lockdowns, consequent suicides ... are ignored" There is no evidence that there are consequent suicides. Nor that they are ignored. You write "not yet" .... a hand-wavy statement which instantly adds FUD any topic. It could be that lockdowns cause people to suddenly die 3 years years later. I could make up lots of "it could be" scenarios. Unsupported claims, with evidence contrary to the claim, should not be used to make policy decisions. And this is a hypothetical about making a policy decision.