2 ms·
>a title that makes it sound unjustified At time of writing, the title is "Twitter adds warning label to tweet from Liberal candidate Chrystia Freeland", and t
by happytoexplain 5y ago
>a title that makes it sound unjustified
At time of writing, the title is "Twitter adds warning label to tweet from Liberal candidate Chrystia Freeland", and the subtitle is "Liberal party says it disagrees with label and is seeking explanation from Twitter". That seems like a pretty neutral tone to me, unless I'm misunderstanding something.
- OJFord 5y agoNo, that was the title when I commented too. I suppose it's just that 'Twitter adds warning label' was the focus (Twitter the subject) that made me remark on that. Versus, say: > Freeland tweets video altering O'Toole message (Twitter warning a minor detail, or subheading perhaps.) Or even just changing the subject: > Freeland promotes video mischaracterising O'Toole message, Twitter alleges I suppose my point is if Twitter's the subject, it seems like a story 'about Twitter', which makes it read like it shouldn't have done what it did, to me at least. (I said elsewhere but just to reiterate, no agenda or bias here - I'm British, live in the UK, I don't really care much who said what or wins this election. I clicked in to the submission because of the Twitter angle, which as commented just seemed fine and not particularly newsworthy.)