Perhaps because "universal access" is a piece of pablum that doesn't really mean anything, and certainly doesn't exculpate against the charge that someone wants

Perhaps because "universal access" is a piece of pablum that doesn't really mean anything, and certainly doesn't exculpate against the charge that someone wants to open the healthcare industry to private profits. For Twitter to suggest that it is exculpatory is quite a large editorial leap and brings in all sorts of ideological baggage.