3 ms·
1. That article isn't peer reviewd. 2. You linked to an old version that says "However, in July, the effectiveness against infection was considerably lower", i
by Saint_Genet 5y ago
1. That article isn't peer reviewd.
2. You linked to an old version that says "However, in July, the effectiveness against infection was considerably lower", in the current version the same sentence reads "In July, vaccine effectiveness against hospitalization has remained high"
- hypocritepledge 5y agoYou say it "isn't peer reviewed". I say it's a "preprint paper". That's generally how the media describes the papers that respectively go against, or with the narrative they're trying to push.