> offering to fix it, from the very beginning That does not contradict the victim's statement, but it ignores her statement that communications stopped after s

> offering to fix it, from the very beginning That does not contradict the victim's statement, but it ignores her statement that communications stopped after she went public with it and that she claims that she hasn't received any of this compensation yet. There's a big difference between being nice and being on top of something before the media forces you to. I think most people are much more interested in knowing if AirBnB tried to cover this up (with the victim and/or the journalist), than about details of miscommunication. As I commented elsewhere, it's very difficult for either party to provide evidence for or against this. The elephant in the room needs to be adressed in non ambiguous language, to prevent Clinton-Lewinsky syndrom.