4 ms·
It doesn't need to be 100% effective at reducing spread to be useful. That's a high and unnecessary bar to ask any disease prevention intervention to clear. "T
by dangerlibrary 5y ago
It doesn't need to be 100% effective at reducing spread to be useful. That's a high and unnecessary bar to ask any disease prevention intervention to clear.
"This code change reduced response latency by only 50%, so we should probably revert and leave things as they are" is not a thing anyone would say.
- 8ytecoder 5y agoMost news articles I have read on the topic has been consistently misleading. Let’s say 1/5 vaccinated people can get asymptomatic infection and they spread at the same rate as unvaccinated people, almost all stories and articles fail to make the distinction that it’s 75% less infectious and treat the two as equally bad. You can see headlines like “vaccinated people spread coronavirus at the same rate as unvaccinated people”
- lotsofpulp 5y agoWhy does it matter what article writers who do not have healthcare expertise think?
- 8ytecoder 5y agoThat's what people read and get their information from.