3 ms·
A pandemic seems like an awfully long and expensive way of doing that, especially considering they already did so before the pandemic through so many means (man
by bodge5000 5y ago
A pandemic seems like an awfully long and expensive way of doing that, especially considering they already did so before the pandemic through so many means (many of which actually make them money rather than cost them, I assume you pay taxes?)
The only group who can be said to have really profited off this is pharma. Maybe they have orchestrated the whole thing, but I'd like to see some evidence first.
- whoooooo123 5y agoThe pandemic doesn't need to have been deliberately engineered; it only needed to provide an opportunity for nefarious actors to exploit. Unless you think we're living through the only crisis in history which powerful people haven't exploited to further their existing agendas.
- bodge5000 5y agoWell again that's not particularly new, even outside a crisis, that's part of every day life. Your hardly a nefarious actor if you're not exploiting anything.
- elastic_is_slow 5y ago> A pandemic seems like an awfully long and expensive way of doing that... Actually a pandemic is a great way of establishing control and surveillance. Read Michel Foucault's analysis of the way the plague has shaped the society and power play between decision makers and average citizens. https://foucault.info/documents/foucault.disciplineAndPunish.panOpticism/ https://foucault.info/documents/foucault.disciplineAndPunish... > The only group who can be said to have really profited off this is pharma. Really? The rich getting richer off the lockdown doesn't count? The governments getting excuses to strengthen the hold on their citizens? Two groups off the top of my head. Also don t try to find some ulterior motif for all of this(conspiracy ppl do this a lot), it can very well be done just for the sake of it.