>80% vaccine efficacy. We were hoping for 50% so that's actually pretty good. CDC says 94% efficacy. https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7018e1.htm https:

>80% vaccine efficacy. We were hoping for 50% so that's actually pretty good. CDC says 94% efficacy. https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7018e1.htm https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7018e1.htm Immunocompromise is 6%. https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/vaccines/blog/immunocompromised-people-are-vulnerable-to-covid-19-we-owe-them-some-answers https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/vaccines/blog/immunocompromised-... - Estimates are that about 6.2 percent of adults ages 18-64 in the U.S. are living with weakened immune function, The vaccine is 100% effective for healthy fully vax people. That 6% is concerning and will differ amount countries im sure. >This is on par with "we had a snowstorm so climate change isn't real" levels of logic. I find your analogy to be very telling. You have moved to another political issue that is quite divided along the same political lines. >Abbott has a mild case and isn't sucking on ventilator. Does abbott have a compromised immune system? Shrug? Should we even discuss the possibility that covid testing has high false positive testing? That Abbott never had covid and his more recent tests only days later he tested negative.