2 ms·
SUVs are possibly safer if you collide with a smaller vehicle. But they are not safer in general. And they are especially not safer for pedestrians as the OP's
by giardini 5y ago
SUVs are possibly safer if you collide with a smaller vehicle. But they are not safer in general. And they are especially not safer for pedestrians as the OP's URL says. Here's another earlier URL on that topic:
https://www.treehugger.com/nhtsa-keeps-blaming-victims-instead-regulating-suvs-and-pickups-4851894 https://www.treehugger.com/nhtsa-keeps-blaming-victims-inste...
SUVs roll over and, when they do, their occupants brains are often smashed. Not good for your next Google interview.
SUVs are less maneuverable and can be unstable if one attempts to change course, especially at higher speed such as freeway driving. This is even more serious in rain and ridiculously obvious in ice/snow.
Sedans are safer b/c
- they are designed to be safer (sedan safety standards are more demanding than those of SUVs),
- they are more maneuverable and brake better and
- they protect you from front/rear/side impacts and from rollovers.
Sure, the sedan is destroyed, but it did it's job, which is to protect you. You can always get a new car but you can't get a new brain if yours is pancaked.
- cybertronic 5y agoWhy are sedan safety standard more demanding?
- evgen 5y agoIn the US there are different safety and fuel economy standards for different classes of vehicles. The traditional SUV is built on a light truck frame and is classified as a light truck, so it does not need to meet the same safety and fuel economy standards that would be required of a sedan. It gets a bit fuzzier when you start to talk about 'crossover' vehicles, which are usually SUV-style vehicles built on sedan frames. The short version is that light truck standards assume things like pickup trucks used on farms or construction sites and not soccer moms hauling three kids and groceries.