3 ms·
Probably because most modern societies agree that cars serve an extremely useful function that is worth some amount of added public risk. But if SUV purchases
by SkittyDog 5y ago
Probably because most modern societies agree that cars serve an extremely useful function that is worth some amount of added public risk.
But if SUV purchases are mostly driven by vanity and comfort, it's much harder to morally justify them.
Also, banning cars completely simply isn't a realistic policy goal, whereas limiting or eliminating SUVs could plausibly get some political traction. Why let perfect be the enemy of good?
- giantg2 5y agoIt's also possible to change city designs to be more safety friendly, or to limit speed (under 20mph has the same outcomes whether it's a car or SUV). These changes would be beneficial across the board and not just for a single vehicle type. These would also be more achievable than trying to eliminate SUVs (the ones on the road currently could last decades).