3 ms·
> I clearly recall some people from the NoSQL camp (read non-relational data stores, non SQL enabled) saying that SQL itself is bad and something else is needed
by alnayyir 15y ago
> I clearly recall some people from the NoSQL camp (read non-relational data stores, non SQL enabled) saying that SQL itself is bad and something else is needed
No, wrong, irrelevant, who said this?
- kermitthehermit 15y agoI know it's wrong, you'll have to kill me to make me stop using SQL. I wish I still had the article from 2009 - 2010 which said that SQL is too difficult and other things like that. Anyway, this is what I was talking about when I originally replied.
- alnayyir 15y agoI'm fond of SQL, you're either intentionally misinterpreting me or I'm not being clear. Non-relational databases are not about not using SQL, to believe so is dense and willfully ignorant. I asked for specifics, you didn't provide them. I have to assume you're a troll at this point. I'm done here.
- kermitthehermit 15y agoOk, maybe I didn't use the right words or something: There was an article from someone in the NoSQL camp which said that SQL is bad. I DO and DID understand that the querying language isn't restricted to relational databases. What I was saying I REMEMBER reading something a while ago on the website of a NoSQL store or in an article which said something along the lines: "SQL is old and should be deprecated anyway, it was time for something new" THAT was why I was amused. If you think I was trolling or anything, ok, I'll just stop commenting on this site. It's not worth the trouble at all. This is my last comment. edit: I think this was it: http://gigaom.com/cloud/facebook-trapped-in-mysql-fate-worse-than-death/ http://gigaom.com/cloud/facebook-trapped-in-mysql-fate-worse...