4 ms·
I never said that the infringement was related to the brake. I thought I was pretty clear that the patents were about skin-sensing technology. And "not superio
by frosted-flakes 5y ago
I never said that the infringement was related to the brake. I thought I was pretty clear that the patents were about skin-sensing technology.
And "not superior" is subjective. If the SawStop tech has enough false triggers and destroys as many blades as it apparently does based on what I've read (probably depends on material being cut), the increased cost almost certainly isn't worth it unless you're a high school shop class.
- foerbert 5y agoI don't think that was clear. You mentioned the Bosch system had a patent issue and immediately mentioned it didn't even use a break. While it's possible to read that as the Bosch system being superior because it lacks a break, the main topic was the patent issue, so it's more natural to read it as being related to that. Meanwhile there wasn't even a mention of the sensing technology.
- frosted-flakes 5y agoI literally said "flesh detection technology" in my original comment.