4 ms·
This appeals to Marilyn Oppezzo's and Daniel Schwartz's 2014 study on walking and creativity [1], based on an experiment with 48 subjects, a lot of subjective a
by AlexCoventry 5y ago
This appeals to Marilyn Oppezzo's and Daniel Schwartz's 2014 study on walking and creativity [1], based on an experiment with 48 subjects, a lot of subjective assessment, and a weird constraint which sounds like p-hacking ("The CRA task always followed the GAU task, because pilot work indicated that the CRA could be demoralizing, which interfered with performance on an immediately following GAU task.") Does anyone know whether it has been replicated? My money would be on replication failing.
[1] https://aaalab.stanford.edu/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/Oppezzo2014GiveYourIdeasSomeLegs.pdf https://aaalab.stanford.edu/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/Oppez...