3 ms·
I don't understand the dismissal of content because of where it's hosted. There is a large scientific community all publishing well researched videos. It's a f
by Weryj 5y ago
I don't understand the dismissal of content because of where it's hosted.
There is a large scientific community all publishing well researched videos. It's a free platform that has a large audience, seems like a natural fit for anyone looking to teach.
https://www.youtube.com/c/TheAIEpiphany https://www.youtube.com/c/TheAIEpiphany
https://www.youtube.com/c/pbsspacetime https://www.youtube.com/c/pbsspacetime
https://www.youtube.com/c/SciShow https://www.youtube.com/c/SciShow
As some examples
- OJFord 5y agoI enjoy a lot of YouTube content, I just reacted to the 'revolutionary' assertion attached to it. I'm not going to watch your links right now at least, but I assume they are not announcing breakthroughs, that they are great content sure, but following earlier press releases, publications, whatever's applicable? I believe HN is quite efficient, in that I expect to see AC 33% efficiency boost in paper/startup/PR/etc. form. Then maybe the 'how it works' or explainer videos later, sure, but you can't claim 'revolutionary' at that point. Someone else pointed out it is new, it's just that for some reason the submittor chose the video instead of the company site announcing it which includes the video.