4 ms·
Only two remote holes in the default install, in more than 10 years
- stassats 18y agoIs that a hole? Is that a default install?
- gopher 18y agoA security hole? Indeed. In the default install? No, but anyways, those are the security guys and I feel this was funny:-)
- silentbicycle 18y agoNot on OpenBSD at all. That's Solaris. (http://openbsd.org/faq/faq8.html#wwwsolaris http://openbsd.org/faq/faq8.html#wwwsolaris)
- gstar 18y agoI cant decide if that's classy or cheeky. But regardless, I dont know if a bug in cvsweb counts as openbsd - does it?
- silentbicycle 18y agoNot when cvsweb is running on Solaris.
- garrydanger 18y agowhy run solaris at all when there is only 2 remote holes in the default install of openbsd?
- silentbicycle 18y agoProbably because when somebody donates tons of space and bandwidth to you, it's rude to argue with them over their choice of OS. http://openbsd.org/faq/faq8.html#wwwsolaris http://openbsd.org/faq/faq8.html#wwwsolaris
- jazj 18y agoIn before OpenBSD fanboys fall over themselves to point out AH BUT THAT'S NOT THE OPENBSD DEFAULT INSTALL. Oops, too late.
- there 18y agooh no, a lame xss bug in a 3rd party cgi script that runs on a solaris web server hosting a website that uses no cookies. surely this is big news!
- shadytrees 18y agoYou have achieved the difficult task of making CVS less usable.
- tptacek 18y agoOH NOEZ! U G0TZ MY CVSWEB COOKEEZ!
- dguido 18y agoThis was posted on full-disclosure August 6th. http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2008/Aug/0074.html http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2008/Aug/0074.html