This is a strange bug. As if they weren't making predictions about where the yellow light would have to be one second later, by using at least speed and acceler

This is a strange bug. As if they weren't making predictions about where the yellow light would have to be one second later, by using at least speed and accelerometer data, and compare the expected result with the new reality. This is not necessarily a job for lidar, they are just omitting some checks. At second 18 [1] a street light comes into play which looks similar to the moon. That relative movement is what the system should have been expecting from the moon, but they apparently just re-computed the assumption that the moon is a traffic light which is moving along with the car. It's somewhat revealing that they are not doing these kind of checks. I actually can't believe that they aren't doing it, but I can't see a case where the traffic light would always be at the same spot, if you have velocity and acceleration data at hand. A traffic light is a very important thing. [1] https://youtu.be/7UF-S2czdCk?t=18 https://youtu.be/7UF-S2czdCk?t=18