3 ms·

We're not having detection failures. Then what do you call them hitting stationary things regularly?

• iknowstuff 5y ago
  Radar
• ajross 5y ago
  A lie. Or at least a giant [citation needed]. What evidence exists seems to show (not really surprisingly) that the cars are safer with AP engaged than when not.
  • coryrc 5y ago
    https://www.necn.com/news/national-international/us-agency-opens-formal-probe-into-tesla-autopilot-system/2536444/ https://www.necn.com/news/national-international/us-agency-o... https://www.foxnews.com/auto/tesla-smashes-overturned-truck-autopilot https://www.foxnews.com/auto/tesla-smashes-overturned-truck-... How often do people hit a giant stationary object in the middle of a nearly-empty freeway?
  • FireBeyond 5y ago
    > What evidence exists seems to show (not really surprisingly) that the cars are safer with AP engaged than when not. Good way to change goal posts. There are many, many instances of Teslas hitting large stationary objects on roads, and who knows more instances of near misses due to driver intervention. When the AP can be engaged, which is usually 'better' conditions. Unfortunately humans don't always have the option of driving in 'better' conditions, so this is an entirely cherry picked subset of data.