3 ms·
> It did spawn more videos about how the car actually worked that were worth watching. Yes, including one by him, in which he specifically addresses the shortc
by kbenson 5y ago
> It did spawn more videos about how the car actually worked that were worth watching.
Yes, including one by him, in which he specifically addresses the shortcoming of the video you are referencing and notes it's an example of what he considers a failure of him providing enough information in the video.
- gmiller123456 5y agoI never understood this type of reasoning, where just because the creator(s) acknowledge their shortcomings, you're not allow to not like the video because of it, or complain about it. So I'll repeat, "I didn't like the video", don't take it personally.
- kbenson 5y agoIf it's a criticism of the video in isolation, then that holds merit. It sounded to me like it was a criticism of his technique and how he does things. That he acknowledged that as a mistake to rectify makes it less valid as a critique of that as long as he actually changes.
- gmiller123456 5y agoThe person I was replying to asked for a specific example, I provided one. I still like his content, still subscribe, and have watch most of his videos since. Seems like some people are just taking this as a "hate on Vertasium" post.