3 ms·
In this scenario, how would the first criteria be met? "Content is added surreptitiously to the DB"? From my understanding Apple blindly accepts the list of ha
by istingray 5y ago
In this scenario, how would the first criteria be met? "Content is added surreptitiously to the DB"?
From my understanding Apple blindly accepts the list of hashes from their trusted soueces.
- anonuser123456 5y agoApple will see the results of the matched images however. Given that Apple believes their algorithm will generate an impossibly small quantity of false positives, if they start to see political images, sensitive documents etc. show up, that tips them off the DB is corrupt. All of these processes will be subject to discovery in the very first trial generated by this technology. If there is evidence that governments are polluting the DB with non-CSAM content, then warrants issued on evidence from the DB can be overturned. Prosecutors in DOJ and FBI etc. have a strong incentive to ensure that DB doesn't turn into a free-for-all dragnet because it could work to invalidate their ability to use evidence from legitimate CSAM cases.