4 ms·
The photographer in a playground example is understandable, no parent wants a stranger having pictures of their children. That is a violation of the family's pr
by raman162 5y ago
The photographer in a playground example is understandable, no parent wants a stranger having pictures of their children. That is a violation of the family's privacy.
I'm guilty of the home smart speaker as I have a few google/nest minis around my apartment. I don't plan on getting anymore because they're just basically used as glorified alarm clocks and speakers. In theory I would ideally replace them but the effort seems like a large inconvenience since the impact would be minimal considering I still use an Android phone.
- knolan 5y agoIs it? If I’m at the playground with my daughters and I snap a photo with my phone or my Canon dSLR with its big fast lens which should worry you more? Which device captures more data and shares it more?
- raman162 5y agoIn this case the primary subject is your child so it's more socially acceptable but I can still see it making some other parents uncomfortable.
- knolan 5y agoBut who is to know? I could be using a LiDAR equipped phone to scan faces in 3D. I could be live streaming. I could simply taking a family snap. I could be doing anything. Does another person have any right to challenge me? Most parents would feel comfortable infringing the civil liberties of another to protect children from some perceived harm that holding a camera might entail. The point is that we have massive inconsistencies in our respect for privacy and our hysteria over the behaviour of others.