4 ms·

Quite an unusual, but effective, way to mark something as a proof of concept that's dangerous to use: From [1]: "This is as unsafe as it sounds and I don't rec

• wereHamster 5y ago
  > … I don't recommend anyone do it outside of a testing environment. … which is exactly dow it is used in dapr > This is only used in the test (and thus not.compiled and distributed in our binaries). (source: https://github.com/dapr/dapr/issues/3563#issuecomment-901563861 https://github.com/dapr/dapr/issues/3563#issuecomment-901563...)
  • mcguire 5y ago
    There's a teeny bit of a difference between using it to explore monkey patching a go executable and using in the test suite of a released project.
  • reificator 5y ago
    > > … I don't recommend anyone do it outside of a testing environment. > … which is exactly dow it is used in dapr Eh... There's a difference between "a testing environment" as used in that quote and "as part of an automated test" as you mean here. To me the former implies an experimental and/or ad-hoc environment, while the latter implies a stable, production environment.
• Fuzzeh 5y ago
  You don't have the right to use it, even in a testing environment. The license denys you the right to use it.
  • philipswood 5y ago
    Yes, but at the same time demonstrates the code clearly so you could implement it yourself. I'd say this is code sharing aiming at zero reuse.