I disagree. Constant re-evaluation of evidence and improvement of working theories are essential to science. Science needs transparency and honest critique. Ac

I disagree. Constant re-evaluation of evidence and improvement of working theories are essential to science. Science needs transparency and honest critique. Acknowledging falsified results is not an attack on science, it is how science works. It shows that science is not a mysterious cult of knowledge conspiring to hide information and deceive others, but rather the collective effort of imperfect humans who want to understand the universe and make things better for us all.