4 ms·
Honestly though, do we? Why? It almost certainly wasn't man made and intentional. That's the only case we really need to know the origin story for, and I don't
by darawk 5y ago
Honestly though, do we? Why?
It almost certainly wasn't man made and intentional. That's the only case we really need to know the origin story for, and I don't think anyone serious thinks that is plausible.
Otherwise, the worst case is that it was a lab accident of some kind. It'd be fun to point and blame China for it and all, but is it something we really need?
- sushikokk 5y agoYes.like air crash investigations, to avoid it happening again.
- philliphaydon 5y agoWe don’t know if it was man made or not, or intentional or not. There’s a lot of conflicting evidence. What we do know is the ccp is blocking any sort of investigation into the origin and possible cause. They began trying to sweep it under the rug just like SARS. The downside of all this is that the people of China suffer, when it’s not china that’s to blame. It’s the ccp.
- ramblerman 5y agoThe problem with the boeing 737 MAX was also not intentional. Unless you would argue we shouldn't investigate that either, why do you make a distinction here?
- blitzar 5y agoBoeing has been fined $2.5bn by the US justice department after being charged with fraud and conspiracy in connection with two fatal crashes of its 737 Max airliner. Sounds like the DOJ found intention in there.
- redis_mlc 5y agoEverything you said is not only false, it's deliberately evasive. There's around a 90% chance it was intentionally modified and escaped one of the WIV labs (mice with humanized lungs were used for testing.) Even the moronic head of WHO, who's a doctor, admitted a couple of months ago that "obviously labs leak." See my post above for more early details. There's nothing wrong with blaming China, especially since they've been uncooperative with any investigation, and fed WHO false information until today (the previous WHO visitors to Wuhan were given a report by the CCP to use.) In fact, it's certain they're working on the next corona variant since that's the job of the WIV labs. Is the problem on HN that only a few people know the timeline and facts, or are you folks wilfully blind? I'm genuinely curious how after 18 months posts like the above are still written.