3 ms·

It’s not being discriminated against based on some protected class. Being vaccinated is a choice, unlike skin color. The government will not let you serve alco

It’s not being discriminated against based on some protected class. Being vaccinated is a choice, unlike skin color. The government will not let you serve alcohol at a restaurant unless you check the drinker’s age. The government will now also not let you serve diners indoors unless you check they have been vaccinated.

quantumBerry 5y ago
>It’s not being discriminated against based on some protected class. Being vaccinated is a choice, unlike skin color. Good to know we've established that you're ok with folks being shut out of a diner by mandate of government, so long as the reason is something other than related to a protected class. How about we ban everyone under 40 from dining indoors -- after all age discrimination is legal as long as it's against those under 40. We can also outlaw anyone who makes their living in the information economy, they shouldn't have chosen that career if they wanted to . And I think I want to ban anyone who drives or rides in motor vehicles, because there's a public safety risk as drivers and passengers of motor vehicles are one of the most common causes of traumatic death. >The government will not let you serve alcohol at a restaurant unless you check the drinker’s age. The government will now also not let you serve diners indoors unless you check they have been vaccinated. So you're one of those that thinks those old enough to go to war shouldn't be able to have a drink? The drinking age is one of the weakest arguments for government control and is an excellent example of overstepping gone wrong. I seriously can't tell if you might be using that example as evidence to discredit the mandates.
names_are_hard 5y ago
>It’s not being discriminated against based on some protected class. Being vaccinated is a choice, unlike skin color. Religion is a choice and is also a protected class, so those are not mutually exclusive categories.

quantumBerry 5y ago

>It’s not being discriminated against based on some protected class. Being vaccinated is a choice, unlike skin color. Good to know we've established that you're ok with folks being shut out of a diner by mandate of government, so long as the reason is something other than related to a protected class. How about we ban everyone under 40 from dining indoors -- after all age discrimination is legal as long as it's against those under 40. We can also outlaw anyone who makes their living in the information economy, they shouldn't have chosen that career if they wanted to . And I think I want to ban anyone who drives or rides in motor vehicles, because there's a public safety risk as drivers and passengers of motor vehicles are one of the most common causes of traumatic death. >The government will not let you serve alcohol at a restaurant unless you check the drinker’s age. The government will now also not let you serve diners indoors unless you check they have been vaccinated. So you're one of those that thinks those old enough to go to war shouldn't be able to have a drink? The drinking age is one of the weakest arguments for government control and is an excellent example of overstepping gone wrong. I seriously can't tell if you might be using that example as evidence to discredit the mandates.

names_are_hard 5y ago

>It’s not being discriminated against based on some protected class. Being vaccinated is a choice, unlike skin color. Religion is a choice and is also a protected class, so those are not mutually exclusive categories.