This rag likes to prattle on about everything being dangerous speech or hate speech that must be ratted out. I wonder why with this story they didn't take the f

This rag likes to prattle on about everything being dangerous speech or hate speech that must be ratted out. I wonder why with this story they didn't take the familiar line of "Freedom of speech does not mean freedom from consequences" for the Afghans. It must be a good time to be selective. They never before cared who defined the controversial concepts or who performed those consequences to what extent. Seems they could only imagine themselves doing it in their morally superior fashion. Well, here is one end-game to the curtailed speech system, Taliban style. Do they not like it or not like who it is directed at?