4 ms·
I really dislike this article: >Quality matters more than quantity. If you read one book a month but fully appreciate and absorb it, you’ll be better off than
by philipswood 5y ago
I really dislike this article:
>Quality matters more than quantity. If you read one book a month but fully appreciate and absorb it, you’ll be better off than someone who skims half the library without paying attention.
Let's measure outcomes instead. Choose between these two scenarios:
1) I spend one month reading a book closely and I follow some memory enhancing technique to retain the material - book club style. I can verbally retell the main points of the book afterwards and discuss it intelligently with others who have done the same.
Or
2) I had a quick look at the book and it's outline, I placed it conceptually in it's genre and in relation to other books covering the same kind of material. I had a normal reading of the chapters that seemed most valuable. I found one actionable insight and immediately worked it into my own set of habits/techniques/schedule. All in all I do this in 1-2h. I do this for 5 books a month.
After a year, I suspect strategy 2 has a better yield.
- emadabdulrahim 5y agoYou can use both strategies depending on the book. If you're unsure about the book, then strategy number 2 is better. Skim and find the interesting bits, if any. If you know it's a dense book and you value the subject and think highly of the author. Then strategy number 1 is better.
- philipswood 5y agoYes, agreed. Personally I tend to go with a just-read-whatever-is-interesting-at-whatever-speed-or-level-of-attention-feels-right-and-what-sticks-sticks strategy.
- spats1990 5y agoAre you talking fiction or non-fiction? Strategy 2 will work pretty well for most non-fiction books, especially trendy ones. It'd be a bit odd for fiction IMO.
- philipswood 5y agoNon-fiction. Definitely non-fiction.