4 ms·
Anyone that starts taking potshots at drones over their property is risking federal charges for shooting at an aircraft.
by thrill 5y ago
Anyone that starts taking potshots at drones over their property is risking federal charges for shooting at an aircraft.
- manwe150 5y agoI thought (more relevantly) there were also laws about shooting without a backdrop to catch stray bullets, since this sounds like a densely populated area, also perhaps shooting towards people: bullets that go up, come down again somewhere else at nearly the same speed.
- leephillips 5y agoNo, they come down at their terminal velocity, which is far slower. Could give you a bump on the head, though.
- jfk13 5y agoThey can still kill you. https://blogs.bcm.edu/2019/12/31/what-goes-up-must-come-down-the-dangers-of-celebratory-gunfire/ https://blogs.bcm.edu/2019/12/31/what-goes-up-must-come-down... https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5912041/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5912041/
- leephillips 5y agoDo you claim to be able to understand the second link? Here is a sentence from that paper: “The mortality rate from falling bullets in general is about 32% that is significantly higher than nonfalling bullets 2%–6% although the latter's impact is much more potential to kill.” I read the first one too. The problem with these anecdotes is that none of them rule out that the injuries were caused by a bullet on a shallow trajectory, with velocity much greater than terminal velocity. The only evidence is that no one heard a shot, but this is not convincing. Nevertheless, there is a potential for serious injury and nobody should be shooting into the air for fun.
- mkl 5y agoIf they go straight up they come down at terminal velocity, but if they go up on a shallower angle they maintain a lot of speed. Mythbusters: https://mythresults.com/episode50 https://mythresults.com/episode50