3 ms·
Even 70+ minutes is dubious for a small liquid fuelled quad-copter. It's more likely there were multiple drones swapping in and out.
by phire 5y ago
Even 70+ minutes is dubious for a small liquid fuelled quad-copter.
It's more likely there were multiple drones swapping in and out.
- dreamcompiler 5y agoThey specifically said it was not a quadcopter. It was probably a fixed wing craft.
- phire 5y agoThey said it was "no standard quadcopter" due to it's capabilities. In the report[1] they explicitly list it has as a rotocraft with an unknown (-1) number of rotors. They also list the UAS type as "quadcopter". At one point in the article they describe it as "hovering" [1] https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/the-drive-cms-content-staging/message-editor%2F1629213934924-UAS+MOR_Redacted.pdf https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/the-drive-cms-content-sta...