4 ms·
The one who pays doesn't matter. Unchecked and applied to adults that line of thinking gives right to terrible things, including slavery. Children are a differ
by GuB-42 5y ago
The one who pays doesn't matter. Unchecked and applied to adults that line of thinking gives right to terrible things, including slavery.
Children are a different story, they are not free, they are under the control and responsibility of their legal guardians. In fact, the status of a child and the status of a slave are not so different, that's why there are very strict laws regarding child labor, because otherwise it could easily end up in actual slavery.
Here the problem is not parental control, that is fine, the problem is that the backdoor is now in place and could be potentially used against adults with all the nasty implications. Again, I think the fears are overblown, but I understand that it makes people uncomfortable, especially since they may have bought an overpriced device on the premises of privacy. Most of the most egregious privacy violations start with "think of the children", even more than terrorists and covid.
- slownews45 5y agoThis is just such a crazy position. If I buy a car it doesn't matter that I own it? If I rent it to you I can't set the terms of that rental? This is just nuts from the EFF.
- mijamo 5y agoYou have the fructus but no longer the usus and associated rights. If you own an apartment it does not give you a right to set up webcams to look at the tenants.
- simondotau 5y agoYou do if those "tenants" are minors. See: baby monitors.
- simondotau 5y agoThere is an enormous difference between a situation where both parties are independent adults, and where the parties are a parent/guardian and their pre-teen child. Trying to make analogies between these is fraught with error.