3 ms·
Western countries don't wage war in the way that lets you hold Afghanistan. Contrast with a successful historic conquering: "In the Mongol invasion of Khwarezm
by Omniusaspirer 5y ago
Western countries don't wage war in the way that lets you hold Afghanistan. Contrast with a successful historic conquering:
"In the Mongol invasion of Khwarezmia (1219–1221), Genghis Khan invaded the region from the northeast in one of his many conquests to create the huge Mongol Empire. His armies slaughtered thousands in the cities of Kabul, Kandahar, Jalalabad etc. After Genghis Khan returned to Mongolia, there was a rebellion in the region of Helmand which was brutally put down by his son and successor, Ogedei Khan, who put all male residents of Ghazni and Helmand to the sword in 1222; the women were enslaved and sold. Thereafter most parts of Afghanistan other than the extreme south-eastern remained under Mongol rule as part of the Ilkhanate and Chagatai Khanate." (Wikipedia)
Modern gentlemans agreement wars only really work between modern Westernized industrial societies. The idea that you could ever nation build in Afghanistan on a mere 20 year period was laughable even in 2001. It's possible results would have been different given a multi-generational timeline but when you aren't annexing the country it's hardly worth the effort.
- stefan_ 5y agoBut an eastern country might? I wonder what happens if you apply the Uyghur playbook to this. You know, carry your Huawei with the state spyware app everywhere or its off to "reeducation camp".
- simmerup 5y agoAt the same time in the modern day you don’t make money by conquering people and skimming their taxes, you make money by selling them shit. You can’t sell anything to the dead
- 2OEH8eoCRo0 5y agoAlso Alexander. I've stayed in a castle in Helmand that I was told was either built by Alexander or built to fight Alexander.