4 ms·

Instead of a symlink to true you could have made an empty script.

• michaelt 5y ago
  And violate AT&T's copyright? Perish the thought!
• viseztrance 5y ago
  Well the symlink command was also easier to share with others having the same issue, whereas a one liner that creates an executable script which returns 0 is less ideal.
  • cmeacham98 5y ago
    An empty script returns 0 by default, thus `touch /path/to/missing/library` is a sufficient (and shorter!) one-liner fix to this problem.
    • viseztrance 5y ago
      I know, but you still have to make it executable, hence it's not as convenient. And on top of this, an unlink is less error prone than a rm -f.