> pattern 4: fun illustrations on dry explanations The description restates this as "make the design reflect the style of the explanation", which I think is be

> pattern 4: fun illustrations on dry explanations The description restates this as "make the design reflect the style of the explanation", which I think is better, since it goes both ways. I can't stand cutesy writing on technical topics, but I've nothing against cutesy drawings, so I can't agree with the title. But on the other hand, I've been disappointed a few times by "friendly style" writing hiding in dry visuals, so I guess I agree about wanting consistency.