That number is so absolutely ridiculous that it deserves explicit sourcing. The article sources promotional material from a consulting firm that networks C-leve

That number is so absolutely ridiculous that it deserves explicit sourcing. The article sources promotional material from a consulting firm that networks C-level execs, but this time they deigned to address others: "We also polled 1,007 full-time and part-time US-based employees between August 2 and August 3, 2021. We included the perspective of these employees in this report." So that is where you are getting that number, which isn't reflected in any actual data from the BLS.