4 ms·
That's not the right thing to do - it seems like you are just freaking her out more. A better way would have been to pass PG's details to her.
by niklas_a 15y ago
That's not the right thing to do - it seems like you are just freaking her out more.
A better way would have been to pass PG's details to her.
- deleted 15y ago[deleted]
- ajays 15y agoI disagree. Giving EJ PG's details, and putting the onus on the victim to reach out to PG, is (IMHO) the kind of attitude that got us here. I think this is what happened with AirBnB too: they probably gave her a number to call "if you need anything", and then just moved on. The victim shouldn't have to go around knocking on doors to get help. Sometimes it's nice if the help comes to victim on its own volition.
- bugsy 15y agoThe victim also shouldn't be stalked or contacted by investors in the company that has already intimidated her and whose gross negligence hampered a speedy resolution to the crimes that were committed against her.
- andypants 15y agoIn this case the 'someone' happens to be PG, a complete stranger to EJ and somebody with financial stake in airbnb, who got EJ's contact info from another complete stranger on the internet?