> It's unbelievably well tested. Not long term. Sorry, but you simply are not going to convince me on this one. It's heavily tested, but not well tested. Ther

> It's unbelievably well tested. Not long term. Sorry, but you simply are not going to convince me on this one. It's heavily tested, but not well tested. There is a difference. > Wrong. The supply is already created. It's already been paid for by the federal government. Your individual demand is irrelevant. If it's already been paid for, then either a lot are going to waste, because they expire, or they are going somewhere else, which means my individual demand, while tiny, is not irrelevant. > If you're unvaccinated, then you are still hurting others by being a vector for (1) incubating the virus and thus spreading it and (2) being a petri dish for deadly mutation to evolve. The vaccinated are vectors and petri dishes too. A virus is going to virus. > And if you did actually already have COVID (and not a cold or any number of other diseases that are mild and share some COVID symptoms), then getting better antibodies would be a good thing. No logic as to why you would not want to increase your immune systems' effectiveness. Because the vaccines may actually not increase the effectiveness of my immune system and may give me extra health problems. There is a logic, and you appear to not have read my blog post about it.