3 ms·
This doesn't scale, though. It's the fundamental problem - unless all your employees are interested in living in a place dense enough to support great transit (
by Arainach 5y ago
This doesn't scale, though. It's the fundamental problem - unless all your employees are interested in living in a place dense enough to support great transit (and willing to pay the rent premium), many of them will have to commute.
There are only a few places in the world with transit of that caliber (Tokyo, London, NYC, etc. ). Even most medium or large cities aren't good enough for that experience. Public transit in Seattle is a disgrace (in most areas you're lucky if you can get one bus per half hour, and that bus is stuck in the same traffic as cars, and those buses never go from where you are to where you want - you have to go downtown and transfer from there, and the buses stop running long before the bars close). BART isn't exactly holding up well either.
- ghaff 5y agoAnd, honestly, rush hour commuting in Tokyo/NYC/London isn't great either. I didn't read the parent as arguing for living near work. Rather I read it as him saying that the commute is what tips the scales towards WFH most days for many people. Which I think is absolutely true.
- dSebastien 5y agoIndeed, I wasn't arguing about living close to or far away from the office. I was arguing about not having the choice of going to the office when we've proven that it's almost never really needed. I'm just for freedom of choice.