Counterargument: Artificially restricting your productivity by denying yourself the features of a high-functioning daily-driver editor and CLI git+make and repl

Counterargument: Artificially restricting your productivity by denying yourself the features of a high-functioning daily-driver editor and CLI git+make and replacing them with a low quality IDE that lacks useful features and the features in it don't work very well anyway is tantamount to goldbricking. This is very common in embedded systems. I ditched one such IDE in a project a couple of years ago and switched to Emacs + git + make + command line compilers. The productivity improvement was huge. Finally, decent tools. Even debugging worked better via command line GDB. It was more reliable than the one in the IDE, and scriptable. The quality of what went into the repo went up as well.