> git repositories don't have "slave" branches, just a "master' as in template or origin That isn't true - master in git comes from master in BitKeeper which d

> git repositories don't have "slave" branches, just a "master' as in template or origin That isn't true - master in git comes from master in BitKeeper which did have slave replicas. https://github.com/bitkeeper-scm/bitkeeper/blob/master/doc/HOWTO.ask https://github.com/bitkeeper-scm/bitkeeper/blob/master/doc/H... Not that there is anything wrong with slave in this context.