> …but “no IDE” is just rejecting everything because you didn’t like one thing; it’s just being lazy. This is the vi vs emacs debate transposed to build tools

> …but “no IDE” is just rejecting everything because you didn’t like one thing; it’s just being lazy. This is the vi vs emacs debate transposed to build tools and as such will never conclude. Some like their tools to be as "complete" as possible, others want them out of the way. You might be closer to the first camp, I'm close to the second, others are in between. All of these choices are fine, there is no canonical truth here and as such the "nonsense" label used above is just that, nonsensical.