I don't find any of that person's arguments particularly compelling, especially this one: > Respect the Unix Philosophy I have no respect for the unix philoso

I don't find any of that person's arguments particularly compelling, especially this one: > Respect the Unix Philosophy I have no respect for the unix philosophy. They go on to clarify: > (Visual Studio's poor man's autocomplete is a prime example) And so from this I deduce that the author considers autocomplete to NOT be part of the "one thing" that an editor, under the Unix Philosophy, is supposed to do. But both emacs and vim have autocomplete capability, so either autocomplete in an editor is only philosophically acceptable if it's good enough, or emacs and vim are not worthy of the Philosophy.