> Would you similarly argue that the postal service needs to open every letter and inspect it to ensure there aren't photos of child porn contained within? The

> Would you similarly argue that the postal service needs to open every letter and inspect it to ensure there aren't photos of child porn contained within? The reason that isn’t done has nothing to do with law or ethics, it’s purely not done because it is impractical. In countries where it’s illegal to mail currency, all letters carrying currency are intercepted, because it’s easy to do. I for one would not for one second mind if they had a machine that made a sound if a letter carrying cp went through was used to intercept cp. Would you really be against this?