4 ms·
I find it interesting to see a blog post about 'the tyranny of the minimum viable user' when the website itself doesn't work without Javascript. The irony is, t
by bArray 5y ago
I find it interesting to see a blog post about 'the tyranny of the minimum viable user' when the website itself doesn't work without Javascript. The irony is, the article text is almost entirely contained inside the description meta.
- dredmorbius 5y agohttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22039943 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22039943 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22041243 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22041243
- bArray 5y agoIt's an extreme stance to ban all JS - but if you're going to make a post about dumb phones that requires a modern smart phone to even view it, seems backwards to me.
- dredmorbius 5y agoThat's a misrepresentation of the proposal. JS is not banned. Sites which present no content without JS (including Diaspora pods) would be inelligible for submission.