3 ms·
> if you don't analyse something over 10 years, you don't know its effect over 10 years Yes, that is why long term studies are done. Vaccine as a methodology h
by wizardofmysore 5y ago
> if you don't analyse something over 10 years, you don't know its effect over 10 years
Yes, that is why long term studies are done. Vaccine as a methodology has been proven effective. Many diseases are non-existent now thanks to it.
My knowledge is limited with respect to COVID vaccines but if they are any thing like the vaccines developed for flu strains then they will not have any adverse impact.
>By using a variety of different vaccines all over the world the expression of humanity is that we are spreading the risk among various vaccine types or contracting COVID itself.
"spreading the risk among various vaccine types" could you elaborate on this?
- hutzlibu 5y ago"Yes, that is why long term studies are done. Vaccine as a methodology has been proven effective. Many diseases are non-existent now thanks to it." But aren't the new vaccines of a different kind? Genetically engeneered? So I too had my doubts, before getting the shot. And I still do. But what I do know for example is, that I had strong side effects after the first dose. And also strong side effects just before my second shot of Astra. In other words, the mind is a strong factor here and the body is used to deal with alien dna all the time, so I do not worry too much about long term effects.
- webmobdev 5y ago> But aren't the new vaccines of a different kind? Genetically engeneered? Only some are (those based on mRNA and DNA). There are many others based on older biotech (using inactivated virus) too. I think some of the protein based vaccine, like Novavax, are also older tech than mRNA / DNA based ones, and have been studied longer (someone more experienced can chime in and correct me if I am wrong).