> Google is right to cut remote workers' pay. The alternative is inequity and an overpaid nomadic class. Ie, we have to introduce pay inequality because otherw

> Google is right to cut remote workers' pay. The alternative is inequity and an overpaid nomadic class. Ie, we have to introduce pay inequality because otherwise there will be inequality. If nobody cuts their pay, they will be overpaid, because they are nomadic? And some discussion about how pay should match cost of living rather than value added or competitive rates? The author may have a good point but the article itself is not great and wanders a lot