3 ms·

Seconded. It is hard to write a defense of TC given past events. However in this case they are SPOT ON. None of the stories are overtly "drama" or "editorializ

Seconded. It is hard to write a defense of TC given past events. However in this case they are SPOT ON. None of the stories are overtly "drama" or "editorializing" on TC's part. EJs posts are dramatic enough. PG has come out in explicit defense on AirBnB's behalf when they are very clearly falling short in the ethical and "right thing to do" department, not to mention trying to censor somebody by pressuring them. Taking about closing funding rounds to a person who has their house burgled and trashed is beyond ludicrous. Disappointing...all in all.

capdiz 15y ago
They aren't falling short on being ethical. If you had read the very first story airbnb came out with a pretty decent explanation. I believe they were too ethical in the first place. They gave out a lot of info to be exact. To put it blantly they were overly nice and this chick is takin advantage of that. But TC did nothin wrong though.
sliverstorm 15y ago
PG has come out in explicit defense on AirBnB's behalf when they are very clearly falling short in the ethical and "right thing to do" department Well, he is invested in them, and he is only human. While I am not saying that is why he is backing AirBnB, it's good not to forget where people are coming from and where their interests lie.
- wisty 15y ago
  It's also possible he thinks he is acting in good faith. It's possible that AirBnB gave a different story to PG, when he asked what was going on, and they complained about how the press was misrepresenting them. PG then blogs their excuses, having taken them as gospel. I'm really surprised how definitive PG sounds. He's not saying "The CEO reassured me in a private chat ...", he's acting like he was a fly on the wall, and saw it all take place.
- prodigal_erik 15y ago
  pg once cited Mark Twain's "Corn-pone Opinons" essay in a link from "What You Can't Say". I expect he's already given thought to his own biases here, and yes we also ought to remain aware of that. http://www.paulgraham.com/cornpone.html http://www.paulgraham.com/cornpone.html

capdiz 15y ago

They aren't falling short on being ethical. If you had read the very first story airbnb came out with a pretty decent explanation. I believe they were too ethical in the first place. They gave out a lot of info to be exact. To put it blantly they were overly nice and this chick is takin advantage of that. But TC did nothin wrong though.

sliverstorm 15y ago

PG has come out in explicit defense on AirBnB's behalf when they are very clearly falling short in the ethical and "right thing to do" department Well, he is invested in them, and he is only human. While I am not saying that is why he is backing AirBnB, it's good not to forget where people are coming from and where their interests lie.

wisty 15y ago
It's also possible he thinks he is acting in good faith. It's possible that AirBnB gave a different story to PG, when he asked what was going on, and they complained about how the press was misrepresenting them. PG then blogs their excuses, having taken them as gospel. I'm really surprised how definitive PG sounds. He's not saying "The CEO reassured me in a private chat ...", he's acting like he was a fly on the wall, and saw it all take place.
prodigal_erik 15y ago
pg once cited Mark Twain's "Corn-pone Opinons" essay in a link from "What You Can't Say". I expect he's already given thought to his own biases here, and yes we also ought to remain aware of that. http://www.paulgraham.com/cornpone.html http://www.paulgraham.com/cornpone.html