3 ms·
The idea is very good but they f..ed up the language with a lot of weird quirks. Also, the naming convention with "Get-" first doesn't scale. Auto complete is b
by spaetzleesser 5y ago
The idea is very good but they f..ed up the language with a lot of weird quirks. Also, the naming convention with "Get-" first doesn't scale. Auto complete is basically useless when thousands of cmdlets start with "get".
And Powershell is super slow when you deal with a lot of data to the point of being unusable.
Two years ago I worked on a project where we used Powershell a lot. It worked OK but I think next time around I would use Python.
- cutler 5y agoWhich idea exactly was good? PowerShell, to me, is just a typical Microsoft product full of bloat and redundancy. Microsoft couldn't produce a concise language if their existence depended on it.
- spaetzleesser 5y agoHaving a scripting language deal with objects seems a good idea. Also, easy interop with the .NET framework is good. It would have been much better if they had used a variation of C= (which is a pretty good language)
- da39a3ee 5y agoMicrosoft produced Typescript and Lean. Are those full of bloat and redundancy?